Back to Blue’s purpose in developing a roadmap to close the marine pollution data gap is to understand and reduce the impact of pollution on ocean health and provide an evidence base to galvanise action.
Learn more about our roadmap co-design process; watch this short video.
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Workshop 1: Defining a science-based and purpose-driven approach to marine chemical pollution
Summary notes | Summary video
Back to Blue is calling on a broad group of stakeholders to co-design a roadmap for an inclusive and collaborative global approach to ocean pollution monitoring and data governance.
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
This workshop, which is the first of five, sought to ask some of the big questions that will define and inform our subsequent sessions:
Workshop 2: Leverage existing pollution data sources and knowledge
Summary notes
Back to Blue calls on a broad group of stakeholders to co-design a roadmap to close the marine pollution data gap.
This workshop, which is the second of five, sought to:
This summary report does not attempt to represent all the views shared during the workshop; rather, it is a brief synthesis. The purpose of this report is to inform the first draft of the roadmap. We welcome further comments on this summary and the roadmap.
Workshop 3: Building a federated architecture of interoperable databases
Summary notes
Back to Blue calls on a broad group of stakeholders to co-design a roadmap to close the
marine pollution data gap.
This workshop, the third of five, sought to answer:
This summary report does not attempt to represent all the views shared during the workshop; rather, it is a brief synthesis. The purpose of this report is to inform the first draft of the roadmap. We welcome further comments on this summary and the roadmap.
Workshop 4: Technology to increase the visibility of marine chemical pollution
Summary notes
Back to Blue calls on a broad group of stakeholders to co-design a roadmap to close the marine pollution data gap.
This workshop, the fourth of five, sought:
This summary report does not attempt to represent all the views shared during the workshop; rather, it is a brief synthesis. The purpose of this report is to inform the first draft of the roadmap. We welcome further comments on this summary and the roadmap.
Workshop 5: Roadmap implementation and financing
Summary notes
Back to Blue calls on a broad group of stakeholders to co-design a roadmap to close the marine pollution data gap.
This workshop, the fifth of five, sought:
This summary report does not attempt to represent all the views shared during the workshop; rather, it is a brief synthesis. The purpose of this report is to inform the first draft of the roadmap. We welcome further comments on this summary and the roadmap.
The virtual hackathon is a six-week process that will draw on the outcomes of the five workshops to create a working draft of a roadmap to close the marine pollution data gap.
This exciting, outcomes-focused event will enable a global group of stakeholders to co-design the draft roadmap in a virtual environment. The digital collaboration will allow key stakeholders to edit, comment and discuss specific details of the working draft of the roadmap in real-time.
Sign up to the Back to Blue newsletter to receive latest news and research from the programme.
Invalid email address
We welcome your feedback and comments.
If you have an editorial or media related request, a member of the media team will get back to you.
Reading time: 4mins
Reading time: 8mins
Reading time: 6.5mins
Reading time: 10mins
Reading time: 10mins
Reading time: 4mins
Reading time: 5.5mins
Reading time: 3.5mins
Back to Blue explores evidence-based approaches and solutions to the pressing issues faced by the ocean, to restoring ocean health and promoting sustainability. Sign up to our monthly Back to Blue newsletter to keep updated with the latest news, research and events from Back to Blue and Economist Impact.
The Economist Group is a global organisation and operates a strict privacy policy around the world.
Please see our privacy policy here.
Thank you for your interest in Back to Blue, please feel free to explore our content.
If you would like to co-design the Back to Blue roadmap or have feedback on content, events, editorial or media-related feedback, please fill out the form below. Thank you.
The Economist Group is a global organisation and operates a strict privacy policy around the world.
Please see our privacy policy here.
Back to Blue is an initiative of Economist Impact and The Nippon Foundation, two organisations that share a common understanding of the need to improve evidence-based approaches and solutions to the pressing issues faced by the ocean, and to restoring ocean health and promoting sustainability
Please subscribe to the Back to Blue newsletter to receive updates on our progress.
We invite UN and government agencies, universities, scientific bodies, NGOs, private sector representatives, investors and individuals to share their views. We will publish, with your permission, selected submissions on our website. In 2023 we plan to publish a position paper which incorporates the views and suggestions contained in these submissions, and use these submissions to form the basis of a draft roadmap towards an inclusive and collaborative global solution to ocean pollution monitoring and data governance.
Your submission can contain any information that you think this relevant, however we particularly draw your attention to the following questions:
Is there a genuine need for a global effort to address marine pollution data gaps? Why or why not?
What would it take to support and build upon existing global data collection and governance bodies and frameworks to develop a comprehensive picture of marine pollution?
Which organisations need to be involved to ensure success?
How could existing bodies and frameworks be expanded to not just warehouse data but to usefully communicate it to the public and decision-makers in a way that drives meaningful change?