Mar 2025 | Reading time: 10mins
Briefing on the development of Back to Blue’s Roadmap for Action
Despite the serious effects of ocean pollution, our understanding of its impact remains limited. Pollution, climate change, and nature loss comprise a complex ‘triple planetary crisis,’ yet there has been no cohesive global assessment of ocean pollution and its cumulative effects on ecosystems, economies and human health.
The challenge of addressing ocean pollution is much broader than the well-known plastics problem. Pollution encompasses nutrients like fertilisers and sewage, which create dead zones, and chemicals such as PFAS, the so-called “forever chemicals” that accumulate in sea water. Pharmaceuticals and numerous synthetic chemicals further complicate the issue.
Most ocean pollution stems from land-based activities such as stormwater runoff, poor waste management, and industrial practices. Rivers transport pollution to the sea. Offshore industries, such as shipping and energy, also contribute. The lack of a singular pollution source means there is no straightforward solution.
Back to Blue, an initiative of Economist Impact and The Nippon Foundation, has spent the past three years engaging with stakeholders from science, industry, policy and finance, and the United Nations system to understand their perspectives on ocean pollution and co-design an approach to address it.
A Global Ocean Free from the Harmful Impacts of Pollution: Roadmap for Action, (herein referred to as ‘the roadmap’) published in March 2024, represents the culmination of this process.
The roadmap sets out a strategic framework for a global group of stakeholders to collaboratively build a comprehensive evidence base about the impact and extent of ocean pollution and, in turn, spark action to beat it.
Back to Blue’s unashamedly ambitious aim is to have a transformational impact on awareness and understanding of marine pollution. We have sought to catalyse—and contribute to shaping—a coordinated global response to marine pollution.
This briefing note outlines the roadmap’s key recommendations and its genesis.
Reading time: 8mins
Reading time: 6.5mins
Reading time: 10mins
Reading time: 4mins
Reading time: 5.5mins
Reading time: 3.5mins
Reading time: 6mins
Reading time: 9mins
Back to Blue explores evidence-based approaches and solutions to the pressing issues faced by the ocean, to restoring ocean health and promoting sustainability. Sign up to our monthly Back to Blue newsletter to keep updated with the latest news, research and events from Back to Blue and Economist Impact.
The Economist Group is a global organisation and operates a strict privacy policy around the world.
Please see our privacy policy here.
Thank you for your interest in Back to Blue, please feel free to explore our content.
If you would like to co-design the Back to Blue roadmap or have feedback on content, events, editorial or media-related feedback, please fill out the form below. Thank you.
The Economist Group is a global organisation and operates a strict privacy policy around the world.
Please see our privacy policy here.
Back to Blue is an initiative of Economist Impact and The Nippon Foundation, two organisations that share a common understanding of the need to improve evidence-based approaches and solutions to the pressing issues faced by the ocean, and to restoring ocean health and promoting sustainability
Please subscribe to the Back to Blue newsletter to receive updates on our progress.
We invite UN and government agencies, universities, scientific bodies, NGOs, private sector representatives, investors and individuals to share their views. We will publish, with your permission, selected submissions on our website. In 2023 we plan to publish a position paper which incorporates the views and suggestions contained in these submissions, and use these submissions to form the basis of a draft roadmap towards an inclusive and collaborative global solution to ocean pollution monitoring and data governance.
Your submission can contain any information that you think this relevant, however we particularly draw your attention to the following questions:
Is there a genuine need for a global effort to address marine pollution data gaps? Why or why not?
What would it take to support and build upon existing global data collection and governance bodies and frameworks to develop a comprehensive picture of marine pollution?
Which organisations need to be involved to ensure success?
How could existing bodies and frameworks be expanded to not just warehouse data but to usefully communicate it to the public and decision-makers in a way that drives meaningful change?