May 2024 | Reading time: 6mins
In 2021, the United Nations set out on the largest global ocean science initiative in history. Nearly five years later, and halfway into the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development, it is an important time to take stock of the progress made and the work left to be done. While we have made significant progress on some aspects of ocean health and safety, other areas lag worryingly behind.
Following the April 2024 UN Ocean Decade Conference in Barcelona, Vidar Helgesen, Executive Secretary of the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Assistant Director-General of UNESCO, released the Barcelona Statement, calling attention to areas requiring much more intense focus in the second half of the Decade if we wish to meet our goals for a cleaner, healthier, more resilient, productive, predictable, safe, accessible and engaging ocean.
First on the list is to better understand and address the global distribution of marine pollution and its impacts on human health and ecosystems. While significant steps are being taken toward negotiating a global treaty to end plastic pollution, unfortunately ocean pollution doesn’t stop at plastics. Many less visible but equally harmful pollutants are in our ocean, ranging from sewage and nutrients to PFAS and pharmaceuticals.
The global focus on plastics offers a vital opportunity to spark a broader effort to end all types of ocean pollution. Achieving the goals of the UN Decade for Ocean Science will require us to take a much more holistic definition of marine pollution, and to adopt a radically new approach to combating it. As we approach the second half of the Decade, now is the time to take action.
Combatting ocean pollution must be a global, multi-decade effort. The first step is to develop a much clearer understanding of the extent and cumulative impact of ocean pollution, which we know worryingly little about. While many efforts are underway globally to identify and monitor pollutants in marine environments, there is no universally accepted definition of many pollutants, and the infrastructure to collect, aggregate and analyse pollution data in a coordinated fashion is lacking.
The good news is that we now have a plan to address this gap. Over the past four years, Back to Blue, an initiative of Economist Impact and The Nippon Foundation, has engaged with stakeholders across governments, businesses, NGOs and the scientific community to understand the actions needed to develop sustainable, long-term solutions to achieve a pollution-free ocean by 2050.
Back to Blue’s Roadmap for Action, launched in March at the World Ocean Summit in Lisbon, sets out a pathway to unite the existing but often disparate efforts underway among governments, UN agencies, scientists, businesses and NGOs through a coordinated task force dedicated to developing a comprehensive approach to ending marine pollution. The Roadmap’s first priority is to collect and aggregate global pollution data to understand the problem, and where and how it affects marine ecosystems, human health and economic well-being.
A global ocean free from the harmful impacts of pollution: Roadmap for action
As a member of Back to Blue’s advisory board, I have seen first-hand the comprehensive process that has informed the development of the Roadmap. I have great confidence that – if implemented – its recommendations will allow us all to make significant progress in our efforts to end marine pollution. Yet, therein lies the rub. The Roadmap will only be effective if a global coalition of organisations combine to ensure its recommendations are comprehensively adopted.
The roadmap calls for a UN body – potentially The Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, the UN Environment Programme, or a collaboration of the two – to lead the implementation process. I commend the roadmap to these organisations as an important opportunity to deliver on a cornerstone ambition of the UN Decade of Ocean Science: To understand and beat marine pollution.
The Roadmap’s recommendations represent the sort of ambition and urgency that is needed to meet the goals of the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development. They have also never been more important.
Tackling ocean pollution will require a concerted, collaborative effort. The Roadmap calls for national governments, NGOs, businesses, scientists to play a critical role in collecting, sharing and analysing data— and ultimately in leading the change needed to tackle ocean pollution.
The upcoming UN Ocean Conference, to be held in Nice in June 2025, offers an opportunity for these stakeholders to advocate for – and agree upon – a much more ambitious global approach to tackling ocean pollution.
There remains a lot of work to do. Yet, recent developments such as the ongoing negotiation of a global treaty to address plastic pollution are evidence that globally coordinated efforts are possible. Ending marine pollution starts with recognising and tracking the extent of the problem, and then working together to solve it. Back to Blue’s Roadmap for Action offers a framework to achieve both.
Kilaparti Ramakrishna joined the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in October 2021 as senior advisor to the president and director on ocean and climate policy. Prior to this he worked with the United Nations as head of strategic planning at the Green Climate Fund; head of the Office for East and North-East Asia at the UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific; and as chief of cross-sectoral environmental issues and principal policy advisor at the UN Environment Programme. Mr Ramakrishna was also a lead author of the fifth assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Reading time: 8mins
Reading time: 6.5mins
Reading time: 10mins
Reading time: 10mins
Reading time: 4mins
Reading time: 5.5mins
Reading time: 3.5mins
Reading time: 6mins
Back to Blue explores evidence-based approaches and solutions to the pressing issues faced by the ocean, to restoring ocean health and promoting sustainability. Sign up to our monthly Back to Blue newsletter to keep updated with the latest news, research and events from Back to Blue and Economist Impact.
The Economist Group is a global organisation and operates a strict privacy policy around the world.
Please see our privacy policy here.
Thank you for your interest in Back to Blue, please feel free to explore our content.
If you would like to co-design the Back to Blue roadmap or have feedback on content, events, editorial or media-related feedback, please fill out the form below. Thank you.
The Economist Group is a global organisation and operates a strict privacy policy around the world.
Please see our privacy policy here.
Back to Blue is an initiative of Economist Impact and The Nippon Foundation, two organisations that share a common understanding of the need to improve evidence-based approaches and solutions to the pressing issues faced by the ocean, and to restoring ocean health and promoting sustainability
Please subscribe to the Back to Blue newsletter to receive updates on our progress.
We invite UN and government agencies, universities, scientific bodies, NGOs, private sector representatives, investors and individuals to share their views. We will publish, with your permission, selected submissions on our website. In 2023 we plan to publish a position paper which incorporates the views and suggestions contained in these submissions, and use these submissions to form the basis of a draft roadmap towards an inclusive and collaborative global solution to ocean pollution monitoring and data governance.
Your submission can contain any information that you think this relevant, however we particularly draw your attention to the following questions:
Is there a genuine need for a global effort to address marine pollution data gaps? Why or why not?
What would it take to support and build upon existing global data collection and governance bodies and frameworks to develop a comprehensive picture of marine pollution?
Which organisations need to be involved to ensure success?
How could existing bodies and frameworks be expanded to not just warehouse data but to usefully communicate it to the public and decision-makers in a way that drives meaningful change?