Feb 2022 | Reading time: 7mins
The Invisible Wave: Getting to zero chemical pollution in the ocean is a report from Back to Blue, an initiative of Economist Impact and The Nippon Foundation. The report was written by Economist Impact. The overall aim of The Invisible Wave is to bring the issue of marine chemical pollution to a wider audience, one that includes policymakers, governments, the chemicals industry itself, the broader business community, the finance sector, civil society and consumers.
Published in 2022, Back to Blue’s The Invisible Wave: Getting to Zero Chemical Pollution in the Ocean, makes the case for chemical pollution in the ocean to be treated with the same gravity—and the same urgency—as plastic pollution. It found that marine chemical pollution poses a serious and escalating threat to ocean health, demanding urgent, coordinated action.
Marine chemical pollution, plastic waste, and climate change are interlinked challenges. Pollution can exacerbate the adverse effects of climate change. Simultaneously, the impacts of climate change, such as rising water temperatures, heightened acidification, and increased salinity, can amplify the harmful effects of chemicals in the marine environment. This damage has cascading effects on the functioning and resilience of ocean ecosystems. The impacts of ocean pollution are likely to worsen as the increasing production and use of chemicals result in more pollutants entering the ocean.
The Invisible Wave recommends:
Hear from the experts about the deterioration of our marine environments, and the need to shift to safer, greener chemicals production – and more responsible usage and disposal. Watch the video here.
Visualize the causes of chemical pollution, its impacts, and the key steps needed to clean up the sector and, through innovation, to make chemicals an active contributor to a cleaner 21st century economy. Access the infographic here.
Our immersive data story guides readers through the latest science and evidence on the interactions between chemicals with marine environments – and the steps needed to tackle the problem before it is too late. Learn more about the data here.
Back to Blue explores evidence-based approaches and solutions to the pressing issues faced by the ocean, to restoring ocean health and promoting sustainability. Sign up to our monthly Back to Blue newsletter to keep updated with the latest news, research and events from Back to Blue and Economist Impact.
The Economist Group is a global organisation and operates a strict privacy policy around the world.
Please see our privacy policy here.
Thank you for your interest in Back to Blue, please feel free to explore our content.
If you would like to co-design the Back to Blue roadmap or have feedback on content, events, editorial or media-related feedback, please fill out the form below. Thank you.
The Economist Group is a global organisation and operates a strict privacy policy around the world.
Please see our privacy policy here.
Back to Blue is an initiative of Economist Impact and The Nippon Foundation, two organisations that share a common understanding of the need to improve evidence-based approaches and solutions to the pressing issues faced by the ocean, and to restoring ocean health and promoting sustainability
Please subscribe to the Back to Blue newsletter to receive updates on our progress.
We invite UN and government agencies, universities, scientific bodies, NGOs, private sector representatives, investors and individuals to share their views. We will publish, with your permission, selected submissions on our website. In 2023 we plan to publish a position paper which incorporates the views and suggestions contained in these submissions, and use these submissions to form the basis of a draft roadmap towards an inclusive and collaborative global solution to ocean pollution monitoring and data governance.
Your submission can contain any information that you think this relevant, however we particularly draw your attention to the following questions:
Is there a genuine need for a global effort to address marine pollution data gaps? Why or why not?
What would it take to support and build upon existing global data collection and governance bodies and frameworks to develop a comprehensive picture of marine pollution?
Which organisations need to be involved to ensure success?
How could existing bodies and frameworks be expanded to not just warehouse data but to usefully communicate it to the public and decision-makers in a way that drives meaningful change?